|
Blisterpackaging Materials for Pharmaceuticals
Please note we do not supply any materials; this
page is for information only. If you would like to contribute to
this section please contact us at info@sepha.com
What are the main considerations when selecting suitable
blisterpacking materials?
The choice of forming and sealing materials used depends on the
degree to which the product needs to be protected from light, heat
and moisture. Each material has different resistance to each of
these elements and will affect the shelf life and storage conditions
of the packaged drugs. Tests are usually carried out during a drug's
development (stability studies) to identify which materials are
most suitable, bearing in mind the differing cost implications.
The plastic forming films such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC),
polypropylene
(PP) and polyester (PET) are thermoformed, and are usually
colorless
and transparent. However for child-proof packs, or if the drug must
be protected from light, forming films can also be opaque.
Forming Films
The forming film is the packaging component that receives the
product in deep drawn pockets. Plastic forming films such as polypropylene
(PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) can be thermoformed, but support
materials containing aluminum are cold formed. The forming film
and lidding material are an integrated package and must match one
another precisely.
The forming film is usually colorless and transparent. However
if the manufacturer wishes to make a childproof package, or if the
drug must be protected from light, then forming films can also be
opaque.
PVC (polyvinyl chloride)
(Contributed by : Helmuth
Leitner, Solvay SolVin, Sept 2004)
PVC used as a forming film is called rigid PVC because it is
almost free of softening agents. Currently it
is the most widely used forming film and displays
ideal forming characteristics. Its water-vapor permeability is very
low. However, PVC was widely criticized because its combustion
results in hydrochloride emissions, and if combustion takes place
under certain conditions it can produce dioxins. New studies* have
shown that in today's incineration plants PVC doesn't create any
problem and energy recovery of plastics including PVC is a
sustainable operation.
* References:
1. Wikstrøm, E., 1999. The Role of Chlorine during Waste
Combustion. Thesis - Umeå University ; Wikstrøm, E., 2000. Final
Report
2. Umeå-study. Doctoral thesis by E. Wikstrøm, University of
Umeå, Sweden The role of Chlorine during Waste Combustion (Wikstrøm,
1999).
3. Doris Menke, Hiltrud Fiedler und Dr.-Ing. Heiner Zwahr; Mull
und abfall 6-02, June 2002, page 322-332, ISSN 0027-2957.
4. PVC and municipal solid waste combustion : burden or benefit ? by LPM Rijpkema TNO report R 99/462 . Institute of
Environmental Sciences, Energy Research and Process Innovation.
TNO-MEP P.O. Box 342 7300 AH Apeldoorn, The Netherlands. Phone : 31
55 549 34 93 fx : 31 55 541 98 37
PVDC (polyvinylidene chloride)
PVDC-coated PVC has characteristics similar to those of uncoated
PVC except that the water vapor permeability of films coated in
this way is reduced by a factor of 5-10. The coating is applied
on one side and usually faces the product and the lidding material.
PVC and ACLAR (CTFE)
PVC-CTFE films made from PVC and ACLAR (CTFE) have the lowest water-vapor
permeability of all the films used for blisterpackaging. The environmental
concerns raised about PVC also apply to PVC-CTFE film.
PP (polypropylene)
There is an increasing trend towards the use of PP as a support
material for blister packages. The water-vapor permeability of uncoated
PP is lower than that of PVC and is comparable to the water vapor
permeability of PVDC coated PVC. One problem posed by PP processing
is thermoforming. The temperature required for thermoforming PP
and the temperature of the subsequent cooling process must be precisely
controlled.
Another problem is warping of package - often resulting in the
requirement for PP formed packages to be straightened before cartoning.
New High Barrier Thermoforming Film.
There is a new high barrier thermoforming film based on a new type
of plastic granules called COC (cyclo-olefine copolymer). It is suitable
for pharmaceutical and cosmetic packaging applications, where excellent
moisture barrier properties, outstanding transparency and good rigidity
are required.
There are different structures available of which the common ones
are:
 |
30 my PP / 190 my COC / 30 my PP - AMPARIS 190 |
 |
30 my PP / 300 my COC / 30 my PP - AMPARIS 300 |
The COC films are solvent-free laminated to both sides with 30
micron PP films, consequently the laminate is free from solvents.
The packaging system in combination with PP-sealable aluminum push-thru
lidding foils guarantees a high seal integrity. Peel and peel-push
laminates are also available.
The AMPARIS films can be thermoformed on existing blister lines
for PVC, PVC/PVDC and ACLAR.
These new films are sold by Algroup Wheaton under the trade name
Amparis.
PS (polystyrene)
PS is perfectly suitable for thermoforming but its high water-vapor
permeability does not permit its use as a blister material for pharmaceutical
purposes.
Coldform film (biaxally orientated polyamide
(OPA), aluminum and PVC)
OPA-ALU-PVC (nylon-ALU-PVC), makes it possible to almost entirely
eliminate water-vapor permeability. Also because of the high share
of aluminum in this laminate, recycling of this material has become
feasible, particularly because most lidding materials also consist
of aluminum. Enormous efforts are being made to replace PVC with
PP in such laminates in order to comply with environmental standards.
Like other laminates containing aluminum, the OPA-aluminum-PVC laminate
is cold formed instead of being thermoformed. The cost/m2 of this
is equivalent to PVDC-coated PVC. Cold forming, however, requires
more packaging material than thermoformed plastic film for packaging
the same number and the same size of tablet or capsules.
Normally the permeability of plastic forming films increases with
rising temperature. This is not true for aluminum formed packaging.
Forming plastic film also causes a noticeable reduction in the thickness
of the material. However when comparing the water-vapor transmission
rates of the base material with that of the finished package there
is not always a direct relationship between the thickness of the
film and the water-vapor barrier effect.
|